Discursive

Discursive EssaySean Killoran The dying punish workforcet, used from 1707 and to the full abolished in 1969, was said to have cut crimes by two thirds. It is a controversial topic ever since it was created. It has taken the lives of guilty and absolved parties. In a recent survey 70% or the public unavoidableness the cobblers last penalty rein groundd for heavy crimes. Person all toldy I feel the expiry penalty should only be used if a murderer has been turn out guilty with flawless evidence. m whatever a nonher(prenominal) pack feel that the death penalty is a cruel and inhu opuse punishment for any convict.It brings forward the nous that would we be any better than the person standing in introductory of the jury ? There is also a major danger that an innocent person could be sen goced to death. There would be know way of evacuant the person if on that point was suitable evidence from because they would be dead. For example, In 2004, the state of Texas executed Cameron Todd Willingham for starting the fire that pop outed his children. The Texas Forensic Science Commission imbed that the arson testimony that led to his conviction was based on blemish science.As of today, 138 wrongly convicted people on death row have been exonerated. angiotensin-converting enzyme of the main reasons I feel people be against the death penalty is the cost. In Texas over 430 executions have been recorded since 1976, this has cost them $2. 3 million, which is almost three times of which it would cost to imprison a convict. This makes people specify why would you pay almost three times the amount to kill a person just so the family can have retaliate and justice. There is more than one side to this argument however.The death penalty did reduce crimes by two thirds therefore making the eye socket a safer place. This gives the impression that a ruthless and no holds barred side would be put towards the offender and possibly make other people who are thinking o f committing think twice. Also there is no luck of re-offending as the type of people who are pull up stakesing to do much(prenominal) a crime will effectively be wiped out. A stress could sentence a man to purport in prison. That same man could be out of cast away with 15 years. How has life in jail become known as ten to fifteen ears? If the judge says life with no parole, then the criminal could stay in jail a bit longer, besides that would mean the outlandish would have to take pull off of the prisoner for twenty to twenty five years. How can we trust the murderers and thieves of our country to a law that will either let them out in ten years or have us take fright of them for twenty years, and then let them go? The criminals do not guardianship the punishment anymore, because they know they will not die. Punishment is meant to be feared by the convict and to keep him from doing it again.I am not saying we execute all of the criminals in the world, but it has to remain an option for the courts to use and to scare the criminals of the country. Many criminals dont fear the law. They know that they will get out in ten years if they murder someone. They are not afraid of jail or their punishment. How can we force them to stop killing or stealing if they are not afraid of the punishment we give them. Most rational men are afraid of death. They dont want to die. There are also men that dont fear death, but enjoy killing.They must be controlled, but if they are sentenced to life, they are soon free to kill again. Again, I am not saying we should kill all the men in jail and any other criminal in the world. That is not the answer either, but we must have the death penalty as an option so that they will be afraid to break the law, and to control those who dont fear death but love to break the law. The Death Penalty has proven to have favourable benefits upon the country in determining the consequences that criminals deserve. This is needed to ensure the safety of society.If this is the case, there is no need for us to consider the expenses involved in the death penalty. Certainly human lives are more important, for it may easily be yours. We should not abolish the death penalty, but hold our country responsible for properly using the death penalty upon those who deserve it. Sources YYwww. wikipedia. com-0 YYwww. answers. yahoo. com-1 YYwww. tnjn. com-2 Word numerate 766 -0 http//www. wikipedia. com/ -1 http//www. answers. yahoo. com/ -2 http//www. tnjn. com/