Biomedical Technology In Ethics and Religion

here be some(prenominal) misconceptions in biomedical genealogy, mostly ca subroutined by the many viewpoints and opinions concerning it. When formulating opinions and viewpoints, it Is important to be properly educated round that particular topic. The lack of fellowship and moral dispute may hinder clientele research. Although critics argue that it is wrong to garble desoxyribonucleic acid, with genetic manipulation, certain diseases posterior be eliminated, and re-create holds the power to produce valet de chambre organs practicable for transplant.Critics argue that it Is unethical to manipulate DNA Some say it Is dangerous because there Is non oft have it awayledge about it. However, genetic manipulation is not a forward-looking concept. Some may say that Hitler had this idea before most scientists. An Indo-European race is what Hitler striver for. If save he k naked as a jaybird that his idea of deciding what genes multitude receive would carry on even to this day. Scientists atomic number 18 discovering new shipway to control what traits atomic number 18 passed through heredity. In the future parents may accomplish to decide what traits their children receive.This breakthrough in technology is really controversial. Some critics shroud to argue that its unethical to manipulate the genetic makeup of human race bollock even if here Specter of Human Cloning). Many unearthly and moral leaders recall that manipulating DNA crosses a boundary that only God has the right to cross. Many in addition opine that scientists should not use human embryo in testing because it is wasting human life. Scientists are developing new tests that stinkpot determine whether or not a child has a birth defect or disability very early on In pregnancy.In this, parents goat decide if they would like to cumber their child or not. Religious and ethical battalion are offend at such(prenominal) tests because they believe that human life should not be a ch oice. The problem is that researchers arent allowed to use human embryo in such tests, Knish said, so Instead, they use wolf embryo(Peeler 6). The conflict with using animal embryo, Is that scientists do not get the same results as they would if they were to use human embryo. People expect exact results and breakthrough discoveries solely they are not pass oning to pay the price.Genetic manipulation holds the chance that certain diseases can be eliminated. This Is one of the many benefits that come with genetic manipulation. Some say that scientists are finding new ways to control what traits get passed through heredity. If that is so, scientists can make the traits that carry heritable diseases vanish. If scientists can manipulate DNA to disembarrass the formation of certain diseases, they will know what causes that disease. This advancement will not only prevent people from obtaining disease but will also eliminate It In people who already have It. We will know disease elimina ted in the future, or we will witness the creation of new and 1 OFF unleashed(Decolletage 75). Some believe that once technology goes so far it will be an unstoppable, dangerous force. Many think that scientists manipulating DNA is imply too far. Can we, however, ignore opportunities to improve human health(Decolletage 51). What if no one in the world had cancer, down syndrome, or otherwise disabilities and diseases? People would not oppose research so much if they knew what the solvent would be. People are afraid to take risks they do not indigence to put their fate in someone elses hands.What if those hands cured complaint and disease? In addition, new biomedical technology such as cloning holds the possibility of cloning human organs that are viable for transplant. Thousands of people distributively year die because of organ shortages. Cloning human organs can eliminate this epidemic. If organs can be especially made for each individual who needs one, organ transplant wait lists can be eliminated. An average of 18 people die each day waiting for transplants that cant take place because of the shortage of donated organs(The inquire Is Real Data).These deaths can be prevented by cloning. However, many people believe that cloning is very unethical and goes against religion. This hinders the formation of cloning and holds butt scientists from imperative research. The lack of persist given by the people for cloning research impedes government and local ending and aid. The delay in documentation and aid creates a rift in research. Many people support biomedical technology and cloning, but only to a certain extent. more or less religious people are concerned about cloning because they believe that only God has the right to give and take life in any form.In reality, fear and the lack of knowledge inhibit many religious and ethical people from supporting the idea of cloning. If we hope to direct the tune of this powerful technology, we should strive t o learn as much as we can about these molecular tools and thus let scientists and corporations know our wishes. Only then can we truly expect to avoid the risks and enjoy the progress and the promises of our genetic future(Decolletage 112). Advocates and antagonists both need to strive for further knowledge about this subject in order to tell scientists exactly what they want.How can scientists know how far to take their new technology, if no one has the correct knowledge to tell them where is too far? In conclusion, there are many opinions and viewpoints on the topic of biomedical technology. These can help but they can also hinder scientific research in many ways. mavin of which is the opinion of religious and ethical people. These people can bring up valid points and bring forth new thoughts and useful ideas about biomedical technology, but they can also let their personal views get in the way.Often times the opinions of religious and ethical people are blurred or disrupted by their personal views. This can lead to extremist views that believe all biomedical technology goes against religion and is unethical. Many people will align themselves with one ideal or theology without educating themselves and considering other viewpoints. In order for both sides of this debate to reach a compromise there must be an open forum of to only communication but also education between both parties.