Condemn the Crime, Not the Person by June Tangney

In convict the Crime, Not the Person by June Tangney is a paper that asserts that the close fitting sentencing for a turn, so they give the gate meditate on it. Most people that redact crimes, have gotten public abasement that is shaming sentences. Shaming sentences is knowing to give the criminal sanction explicitly designed to induce feelings of shame. This means receiving confusion from their neighbors, friends, and family members. It makes them feel ashamed, but it does not give them the chance to chew over on the mistakes that they have committed. The look indicates that a public degradation is not helping the mortal to alter their criminal behavior. man humiliation only make them feel powerless and worthless. In addition, a somebody essential feel shame, and they tend to guts hiding places or visualise defensive tactics to patronise them. In the other hand, the person that did the crime and they need to do partnership of interests services, most of them can reflect on what they did was wrong. I mark off on what June Tangney had illustrated and shared out in her writing, in regards to community of interests services being a sufficient solution to alter their criminal behavior. It allows them to reflect on what they did, and they might not ever so commit crimes again.\nFirst, I agree with June Tangney because I believe that community service helps people reflect on what have they did and did a reparative action. Community service is the caseful of unpaid work, intended to be of social use that the wrongdoer is required to do found on the article that Tangney wrote. As like June wrote, research has shown that this sense of tension and regret typically motivates reparative action. That piece of sentences has a sozzled meaning, and it delivers Junes opinion nearly the community service sentences. The community service program allows inmates an opportunity to give back to the community while at the equal time supporting the sect ions restorative umpire initia...